Say the wrong thing about someone… and it can cost you. A tweet. A headline. A comment under a post. In Ireland, words have come with a serious price tag. 

Last week, the Defamation (Amendment) Bill passed through the Oireachtas, bringing the biggest changes to Irish libel law in years. No more juries in High Court defamation cases. New protections for journalists. New powers aimed at stopping so-called SLAPPs — lawsuits designed to intimidate and silence critics. And crucially, courts will now have clearer authority to order the identification of anonymous online posters — meaning the era of the untouchable “keyboard warrior” may be coming to an end. 

Why does this matter? Because Ireland has long punched above its weight in defamation claims. Despite being a fraction of the size of England and Wales, we’ve historically handled a similar number of libel cases each year. Big jury awards — like the €1.87 million originally awarded to Monica Leech — created a reputation for unpredictability and eye-watering damages. 

High-profile rows have kept the issue in the spotlight, from celebrity disputes involving Justin Timberlake and Jessica Biel, to battles involving Elon Musk’s company X, to cases closer to home involving Louis Walsh and Enoch Burke. Critics said the system created a “chilling effect” on journalism. Others argued that if your reputation is destroyed, you deserve serious redress. 

So, will this finally end Ireland’s reputation as a go-to venue for libel actions? 

On today’s podcast, Newstalk’s courts correspondent Frank Greaney explains what’s changed and why reform took so long. Later, media law expert Olivia O’Kane from Lewis Silken joins Ciara Doherty to look at what this means for journalists, social media users and anyone concerned about their good name. 

You can email your thoughts to newstalkdaily@newstalk.com.